Labor of Love?

Office

Cube farms, Teams etiquette, and the great thermostat war

Published

September 28, 2026

Figure 1: Votes and shares for each question (faceted).

Two of this week’s six questions were office-specific: “Cube Farm Traffic” only went up on HQ’s whiteboard, and “Moving Upward” only went up on RTP’s. Both offices got the remaining four questions. More on the two one-office questions below – they’re part of the decisiveness numbers like everything else, just excluded from the HQ/RTP comparison later on, since there’s no second office’s result to compare them to.

How decisive were these results?

Five of six questions were a simple either-or, so those get the usual binomial test against a 50/50 split. The sixth, “Best Email Signoff,” had four options, so it gets the chi-square goodness-of-fit test instead (see the Week Daze post for why).

TL;DR: Teams Meetings was the most one-sided call of the week – Join right on time beat Start a few minutes early 69–21 (77%). Moving Upward was the closest thing to a real debate: Stairs edged Elevator 18–16, about as close to a coin flip as this poll has ever produced (p = 0.86) – fittingly, it’s also the one question only RTP got to weigh in on.

question N Leader (votes) Trailer (votes) Leader share Margin (votes) Margin (points) p vs 50/50 Leader 95% CI Votes to flip
Teams Meetings 90 Join right on time (69) Start a few minutes early (21) 76.7% 48 53.3% 3.88e-07 [0.67, 0.85] 25
Worst Office Temperature 93 Too Hot (68) Too Cold (25) 73.1% 43 46.2% 9.38e-06 [0.63, 0.82] 22
EISD Tickets 92 Wait until its really a problem (56) Submit immediately (36) 60.9% 20 21.7% 4.70e-02 [0.50, 0.71] 11
Cube Farm Traffic 51 Right (30) Left (21) 58.8% 9 17.6% 2.62e-01 [0.44, 0.72] 5
Moving Upward 34 Stairs (18) Elevator (16) 52.9% 2 5.9% 8.64e-01 [0.35, 0.70] 2
Note:
Sorted by margin (points), largest to smallest.
Figure 2: Leader shares with 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 3: One square per vote: Worst Office Temperature.

Best Email Signoff

The one four-way question of the week: “Thanks” narrowly took it with 49% of the vote, nowhere near the landslide some of the two-option questions produced – four options makes for a much harder plurality to run away with.

question N # options Top pick (votes) Top share Zero-vote options Chi-sq (df) p vs uniform p: top vs chance
Best Email Signoff 118 4 Thanks (58) 49.2% 0 51.0 (3) 4.85e-11 2.35e-08
Figure 4: Best Email Signoff: share of votes per option, with the 1-in-4 chance level dashed.

Does HQ agree with RTP?

“Cube Farm Traffic” and “Moving Upward” only ran in one office each, so there’s no second office’s result to compare them to – they’re dropped from everything in this section.

question Leader (overall) HQ share RTP share Gap (pts) p-value
EISD Tickets Wait until its really a problem 66% (39/59) 52% (17/33) 15% 0.249
Teams Meetings Join right on time 72% (41/57) 85% (28/33) 13% 0.255
Worst Office Temperature Too Hot 76% (45/59) 68% (23/34) 9% 0.509
question Options tested Options dropped (0 votes both offices) Chi-sq (df) p-value
Best Email Signoff 4 0 3.1 (3) 0.376
Figure 5: HQ vs RTP support for every option, every shared question.

HQ and RTP picked the exact same winner on all four shared questions this week – no flips, and the running flip tally holds at 11.

The Alignment Index for this poll alone comes out to 0.9, and the cumulative index sits at 0.89. With total agreement on every winner and reasonably similar enthusiasm across the board, this was a quiet week for office tension.

Do the procrastinators run hot?

“Wait until it’s really a problem” swept EISD Tickets, and “Too Hot” swept Worst Office Temperature – both landslides, and both questions drew almost identical crowds. Let’s bound how much the “let it boil over” types overlap.

Of the 92 overlapping voters, the ticket-procrastinating, thermostat-blaming crowd could be as small as 31 or as large as 56 people (34%–61%), versus about 41 (45%) expected if the two opinions were unrelated. Both landslides are large enough that the floor sits well above zero – there’s a real, forced overlap here, not just a coincidence of two big majorities.